Friday, July 31, 2015

Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife are expecting a baby

Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg and his wife are expecting a baby girl.

Zuckerberg announced the news on his Facebook (FB, Tech30) page on Friday afternoon, tagging his wife Priscilla Chan in the post.

He said the couple had been trying for a few years, and had already suffered three miscarriages.

"You feel so hopeful when you learn you're going to have a child," Zuckerberg said. "You start imagining who they'll become and dreaming of hopes for their future. You start making plans, and then they're gone. It's a lonely experience."
He did not say when the baby would be born.

"Our good news is that our pregnancy is now far enough along that the risk of loss is very low and we are very hopeful," said Zuckerberg.

Zuckerberg married Chan in 2012. "Cilla" recently finished her medical residency this summer.

They posed with their dog Beast in a photo that accompanied the announcement.
"Cilla and our child are both healthy, I'm extremely excited to meet her, and our dog Beast has no idea what's coming." Zuckerberg said. " In our ultrasound, she even gave me a thumbs up 'like' with her hand, so I'm already convinced she takes after me."
The post generated over 200,000 likes of its own within a half hour, as well as 18,000 comments congratulating the Zuckerberg clan on the news.


Many people thanked the couple for being open about their experience of trying to conceive. They also shared many personal and hopeful anecdotes about the difficulties of pregnancy.

Winter Olympics 2022: Beijing chosen to stage Games

Beijing is set to become the first city to have hosted both the Summer and Winter Olympics after it was chosen to stage the 2022 Winter Games.
International Olympic President Thomas Bach confirmed Beijing, which hosted the Summer Games in 2008, had been chosen ahead of Almaty in Kazakshtan at the 128th IOC session in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Friday.
"I am so excited. This is China's pride," Zhang Hong, China's women's 1,000m speed skating gold medal winner at the Sochi Games, told CCTV.
Only Beijing and Almaty had been left in the running after Oslo, Munich and Stockholm bowed to public pressure and decided not to pursue plans to host the winter sports showpiece.

David vs Goliath?

Had Kazakhstan's pitch been successful it would have become the first central Asian nation to host the Winter Olympics.
With significant oil and gas reserves, it is now the largest economy in Central Asia and had been keen to use this event to increase investment, development and raise its profile.

Proven track record

But Beijing has already proved its worth as a successful Olympic host, having hosted the summer version of the games in 2008.
Its pitch was about being a safe choice and a top tourism destination with the infrastructure to handle large events. Becoming the first city to run both Olympic games could be tempting PR for the IOC.

China Xinhua News

Adding to Beijing's bid is the city's proven ability to control smog during the 2008 Summer Olympics. Beijing plans to stage ice events, while snow-based competitions would take place in Zhangjiakou in Heibei Province, 190 km northwest of the city.
Only this week Chinese officials re-iterated that pollution would not be a problem.
Xu Jicheng, deputy director of Beijing 2022's press and communications department, said that"technically the pollution has been reduced and controlled, we have seven more years to go and it will be sunshine and white clouds."

Lack of choice

With only two cities -- both run by what could be considered authoritarian regimes -- bidding for the prestige of hosting the 2022 Winter Olympics the question arises as to whether the games -- and specifically the winter games -- have lost their allure.
High costs and dubious returns have arguably made democratic countries -- where politicians are forced to listen to their voting public and answerable to budget blowouts -- wary of hosting the world's biggest sporting events. 
Over the past two years, cities in Poland, Sweden, Switzerland and Ukraine have all backed awayfrom proposals to host the Winter Olympics.
Oslo's decision not to continue was taken for both financial and political reasons, the Norwegian Olympic Committee Secretary General, Inge Anderson told CNN last October.
Where once the promise of a boost to tourism and better national sporting facilities would suffice, it seems many countries are heeding the lessons learned from the debt experienced by Greecefrom the $11 billion bill for 2004 Athens Summer Olympics.
More recently, there's the estimated $50 billion price tag for the last Winter Olympics in Sochi, Russia.

Human Rights

IOC President Thomas Bach has stressed that the Olympic Charter of tolerance and no discrimination would apply to any successful bidder.

In its 2014 World Report, Human Rights Watch called Kazakhstan's record "poor" in citing a crackdown on free speech, flawed trials and torture in its prisons as major concerns.
Then there are issues with individual rights, the group says Kazakhstan's LGBT community was "living in fear" as a result of pervasive homophobic attitudes and a lack of government protection.
China too has humanitarian issues.
Beijing's 2008 Summer Olympics were marred by forced evictions and Human Rights Watch (HRW) recently criticized China for having abusive, unaccountable domestic security forces.
Activists have also highlighted what they say is the country's deteriorating human rights, with more than 260 Chinese citizens detained or questioned in a recent crackdown on communist party opponents, activists, journalists and academics.
"The Olympic motto of 'higher, faster, and stronger' is a perfect description of the Chinese government's assault on civil society: more peaceful activists detained in record time, subject to far harsher treatment," said Sophie Richardson, HRW's China director.
"In choosing China to host another Games, the IOC has tripped on a major human rights hurdle."

Uber invests $1 billion in Indian market

India is Uber's second biggest market after the U.S., according to an e-mail statement from Amit Jain, president at Uber India.

Jain called India a "global priority market," for Uber.

It has also been a contentious region for the company. Last December, service in New Delhi was suspended after a driver was accused of rape. It was also sued in the U.S. by a woman who alleges she was raped by a New Delhi driver. In February, it subsequently rolled out a panic button for its users in India to alert local police in case of an emergency.

In its latest round of funding, Uber raised $2.8 billion, valuing the company at $40 billion. (It is reportedly raising another round of funding, which could value it at $50 billion.)

This new influx of funds will be used to further improve its operations in India, launch in new cities and develop new payment solutions and products.

Uber expects the investment will contribute to even more rapid growth in the country. It said it's already seeing 40% growth in India every month.

"We expect to hit over 1 million trips per day," added Jain.

The investment should come as no surprise given that the on-demand economy is increasingly going global.

In the second quarter of 2015, there were more international financing deals for on-demand startups than any of the preceding quarters, according to a report from CB Insights. The vast majority of these deals are going to China and India.

Uber isn't without competition from other car-hailing services in India. The biggest is Olacabs, which has raised $810 million, according to the report.

Jain said Uber sees its biggest growth opportunities in India and China and with its global carpooling service, uberPool.

"All three have the ability to significantly improve people's lives, as well as build a great business," said Jain in the statement.

Thursday, July 30, 2015

Ex-university cop in Samuel DuBose shooting death pleads not guilty

Former University of Cincinnati Police Officer Ray Tensing pleaded not guilty Thursday to charges of murder and voluntary manslaughter in the July 19 shooting death of Samuel DuBose.
At the arraignment, the judge set Tensing's bond at $1 million.
Some inside the courtroom applauded when Judge Megan Shanahan announced the bond, and she quickly admonished them and called for order in the court.
Tensing's next court date is set for August 19.
Hamilton County Prosecutor Joe Deters announced the charges at a news conference earlier this week.
"I've been doing this for over 30 years. This is the most asinine act I've ever seen a police officer make -- totally unwarranted," he said. "It's an absolute tragedy in the year 2015 that anyone would behave in this manner. It was senseless."
Deters played body camera footage of the traffic stop shooting that appeared to contradict Tensing's version of what happened.
The prosecutor, who said he was shocked when he first saw the video, was adamant that DuBose, who is black, had not acted aggressively toward Tensing, who is white.
"People want to believe that Mr. DuBose had done something violent towards the officer -- he did not. He did not at all. I feel so sorry for his family and what they lost, and I feel sorry for the community, too," Deters said.
A reporter asked Deters whether he thought Tensing tried to mislead investigators looking into the incident.
"Yes," he said. "I think he was making an excuse for a purposeful killing" of DuBose, who was unarmed.
If convicted, Tensing could go to prison for life, Deters said at a Wednesday news conference.
The DuBose family is reeling from the incident, Cleshawn DuBose told CNN.
"We're devastated, It's heartbreaking. The family is heartbroken," she said of her slain brother.
Another of Sam DuBose's sisters, Terina DuBose Allen, said the presence of body cameras helped bring the story to light.
"I think that if there had not been a body camera, that Sam would have been left with the memory of everyone saying he was basically trying to kill a police officer," she said. "They would have turned a nonviolent man who was loved into a poster child for violence against police officers."
Cincinnati Mayor John Cranley said he's satisfied with how the case has progressed.
"We wanted the right thing to be done, the just thing to be done, the fair thing to be done," he said. "We wanted the truth to come out."
Cincinnati Police Chief Jeffrey Blackwell said these are difficult times for law enforcement agencies around the country, in light of the police shooting death in Ferguson, Missouri, and other shootings involving white officers and black victims.
"It's the most difficult policing environment in the history of our nation. But, that doesn't excuse away bad behavior," he said. "We have got to be right. We have got to be constitutional."

'Feared for his life'

Tensing fatally shot DuBose, 43, during a July 19 traffic stop over an alleged missing license tag. The officer has said he was forced to fire his weapon after almost being run over.
His body camera video captured Tensing telling officers after the shooting: "I think I'm OK. He was just dragging me. I thought I was going to get run over. I was trying to stop him."
He says his hand was caught in DuBose's car, and he later left the scene with another officer to get checked out at a hospital. The footage shows no one rendering aid to DuBose.
Tensing, 25, surrendered to authorities shortly after news of the indictment broke. He has been fired from his job.
Tensing's attorney told reporters that he believes the officer feared for his life.
"The guy jams the keys in the ignition," Stew Mathews told CNN.
"Turns the car on, jams it (into) drive and mashes the accelerator. He wasn't slowly pulling away. (Tensing) feared for his life. He thought he was going to be sucked under the car that was pulling away from him. He thought he was going to get sucked under and killed."
The officer's account was contradicted by Deters, the prosecutor, who said that Tensing was not dragged.
"This just does not happen in the United States. People don't get shot for a traffic stop unless they are violent towards the police officer, and he (DuBose) wasn't," Deters said. "He was simply slowly rolling away. That's all he did."
Footage from a third body camera also exists, a prosecutor's office representative told CNN on Thursday. The video is from the body camera of another responding officer, David Lindenschmidt. His body cam captures Tensing saying that he thought he was going to be run over by a car, according to Tensing's attorney.

'Huge first step'

DuBose's death is the latest in a string of controversial killings of people by police that include Tamir Rice in Cleveland, Michael Brown in Ferguson, and Walter Scott in North Charleston, South Carolina.
The people killed in each case have been black.
DuBose's mother told reporters that she is grateful "everything was uncovered" in her son's shooting.
"I want everybody to just lift up their heads in prayer, and thank God because this one did not go unsolved and hidden," said Audrey DuBose. "We're going to continue to fight together with God."
Mark O'Mara, an attorney for the family, said he does not believe there would have been an indictment if there hadn't been video of the shooting.
"We've now made a huge first step because -- in a situation where sometimes people believe that officers are not held accountable for their actions -- in this case, one is being held accountable. So Cincinnati is showing the rest of us how to do this right," O'Mara said.

Exploding Kittens: How an $8.8 million Kickstarter became a real business

It's had more backers than any other campaign in Kickstarter history. Now, five months after the campaign finished, Exploding Kittens are to be distributed to eager fans all over the world.
The game's creator Elan Lee has gained a valuable insight from the process:
"The biggest lesson for me is that Kickstarter is a terrible place to raise money," the Californian designer reveals.
This seems a strange lesson after the card game -- mixing super-cute with ultra-violence --charmed $8.8 million from a record 219,382 backers across the world.
But the nature of the product, an old fashioned game with high manufacturing costs, and its international appeal meant that Lee and his partners were paying up to $15 to produce and ship each deck of cards, which sell for $20. Kickstarter fees took almost $1 million from their revenue.

A new challenge

The Exploding Kittens team have stayed on course to meet their distribution goal of late July only after a manic scale-up to meet demand.
"We've been dealing with unforeseen levels of enthusiasm from fans," says Lee, who previously worked for Microsoft and has founded several start-ups. "We had to increase our initial order of 500 cards to 700,000, which comes with a whole bunch of international logistics to consider."
"Instead of filling packs in my garage, we have six fulfillment centers -- three in the US, and one in Canada, the UK and Australia. We have massive print production in China. We are sending 17 cargo containers to fulfill orders. We have 800 people working on the project including truckers, lawyers, and accountants."
Adapting from a small scale labor of love to a major international business -- instantly one of the world's larger board game companies - has presented difficulties at every stage.
"I wake up knowing 50 things will go wrong today," says Lee. "This ranges from mundane things like how we deal with different taxes for different regions, to retail locations demanding a thicker box which doesn't fall over."

Fan customers: blessing and curse

The team -- which includes cartoonist Matthew Inman and designer Shane Small -- also learned that humor does not necessarily scale. After putting a maximum age restriction of 30 on a special edition NSFW deck, they were forced to expand customer support to address an avalanche of calls, mostly from people in their late 20s.
Kickstarter funders are more like fans than typical consumers, which Lee acknowledges has been a blessing and a curse.
"With this product we have been upfront -- we have shared the art, how to play, and when it will be delivered. It is a simple contract with the backers that worked to our advantage."
But comments on the Exploding Kittens page show that fans and investors can be more demanding than regular consumers, with several complaints that the game had not arrived even before it was due to be shipped.
"People always want sooner, better and faster," Lee concedes.
Retailers can be circumspect about stocking crowd-funded goods, but in this case stores are demanding more games than the trio can provide. Producers of TV shows, comics and mobile apps are also keen to take the kittens into new arenas.
"Clearly it would be a mistake to walk away now," Lee admits. "But we're a small team and protective of our property."
An expansion pack is on the way, and after that the team will consider the next steps.
But for the man who has become accustomed to 24-hour stress as a result of the Kittens' unexpected success, some relief from their demands is the immediate priority.

Wednesday, July 29, 2015

From witness stand, James Holmes' dad tries to bridge an unfathomable gulf

On the 58th day of his son's capital murder trial, Robert Holmes took the witness stand on Tuesday and repeatedly tried to make eye contact with the mentally ill young man he still calls "Jimmy."
He spoke of his son's idyllic boyhood in Castroville, a small California town south of San Jose that treasured its children. He described the social awkwardness and isolation that came with a move at 12 to a bigger city, San Diego. The boy once surrounded by a pack of friends suddenly had no one.
But he still had soccer, and he still had school. "He still had a family that loved him," the elder Holmes testified.
He looks back now at that move as a pivotal time in his son's life. There was a before and an after. Before is the Oak Hills neighborhood, near Monterey. After is San Diego.

Soccer and happy times

"He was happiest when he was playing soccer when he was a young kid," Robert Holmes testified. "Oak Hills was probably the happiest time in his life -- and ours, too."
In court, Holmes tried with mixed success to connect with his son. He'd spent most of the lengthy trial sitting a few feet behind James. Now, he was on the witness stand, directly in front of him.
Robert Holmes smiled during sidebar conferences. He raised his eyebrows. He mouthed the word "hello."
But, as he has throughout his trial, James Holmes simply rocked softly in his chair at the defense table. It was impossible to see from the spectator's section whether his father succeeded in making eye contact, but his repeated attempts suggest not.
James Holmes does not interact with the people around him at his trial. He doesn't talk to his lawyers, and they don't talk to him. At times, they talk over him as he sits there, rocking.
He refuses to let his parents visit him in jail.

A family history of mental illness

His father's testimony revealed a longer, wider disconnect. As Holmes got sicker, he pushed his family away. His mother and father didn't have a clue.
Despite a family history of mental illness, it was something that wasn't talked about.
Robert Holmes referred in his testimony to "two breakdowns" his twin sister suffered but said he never learned the diagnosis. His own father suffered from some sort of mental illness in his later years, Holmes testified, but he didn't know what it was.
"Our family didn't discuss it," he said.
James Holmes never told his parents about the intrusive homicidal and suicidal thoughts he has said plagued him since 15.
"His mental illness was disturbing to him," testified Jeffrey Metzger, a court-appointed forensic psychiatrist.
His parents never knew he was mentally ill, although they began to suspect something was wrong when he visited them at Christmas in 2011. He was pale, scrawny and worn down.
At one point, his father noticed an odd, wide-eyed, faraway expression. Months later he'd see that look again -- in his son's mug shot.
James Holmes was diagnosed that Christmas with mononucleosis and spent the holiday break sleeping and playing video games. When he returned to school, he avoided calls and emails from both his mother and father.

Worries of where James was headed

They learned in June that James was seeing a psychiatrist. The family had been to counselors before. But this time they were worried because the psychiatrist said James, who had broken up with the only girlfriend he'd ever had, planned to drop out of school.
The parents began to research what might be wrong and came up with a theory -- Asperger's syndrome. They left a voicemail with the psychiatrist, Dr. Lynne Fenton, but she never called back. His father thought James might be depressed.
"If Dr. Fenton had told you how sick your son was, would you have done something to try to help him?" defense attorney Tamara Brady asked. But prosecutor George Brauchler objected, and Holmes was not permitted to answer.
Holmes was making plans to take off work and visit his son in Colorado when the phone rang in the middle of the night. It was someone from the media. There had been a shooting, the caller said.
At first, he testified, he thought Jimmy had been shot.
No, he was told, his son was the shooter.
By now, the horrific facts are well-known.
On July 20, 2012, James Holmes donned a helmet and ballistic gear, packed 700 rounds of ammunition and three guns into his car, and drove to a movie theater in suburban Aurora, Colorado. He tossed a tear gas canister into the front seats and opened fire, killing 12 and wounding 70 in one of the worst mass shootings in recent U.S. history.
He has been convicted of 24 counts of capital murder, and prosecutors are seeking the death penalty. They proved four factors that make his crime deserving of the ultimate punishment -- including exceptionally cruel, multiple murders and ambushing the victims.
The jury rejected Holmes' insanity defense. But there's no dispute that he was seriously mentally ill, suffering from some form of schizophrenia, according to expert testimony.
This is the so-called mitigation phase of the trial. It is up to the defense to raise reasons why Holmes shouldn't be executed. The defense is hoping that mental illness -- and the fact people still love Holmes, at least the boy they knew -- could be reason enough to spare him from the ultimate punishment.
More than two dozen witnesses have testified, painting a vivid picture of Holmes' family life. Unlike many people on death row, Holmes childhood seemed almost idyllic.
"Jimmy was always really an excellent kid," his father testified.
Friends, neighbors, schoolmates and teachers agreed, describing a smart, sweet, exceptional boy.
"A Renaissance child," his fifth grade teacher called him.

Doting parents

The witnesses also spoke of doting parents who did everything they could to raise happy, successful children. Dozens of photos were shown of an adorable baby, a grinning boy, a loving brother, and an awkward teen and young adult. Other photos and videos showed the parents snuggled in a huge bed with their two children, family camping trips and vacations, ball games, summer and winter trips to the mountains, beach outings and even the obligatory Disneyland photos of two smiling kids wearing mouse ears.
It was difficult to believe those photos were of the same person who posed for selfies with orange-dyed hair, spooky black contact lenses and high-powered weapons and body armor, then stormed a crowded movie theater and opened fire.
Robert Holmes encountered that person in jail shortly after his arrest. He barely recognized the promising boy he'd raised.
"He was clearly very messed up," he said. "His eyes were bulging out of his head, and his pupils were dilated. He did tell us that he loved us, and that was good. But I could see something was really wrong with him."
He might not have been sick enough to fit the criteria for legal insanity, but he was and is seriously mentally ill, psychiatrist Metzger told the jury. His illness could ultimately sway jurors to spare his life.
Even if Holmes could appreciate he was doing wrong, the psychiatrist added, he still was influenced by a powerful delusion -- that he could avoid suicide and increase his own self worth by taking the lives of others.
"I think Mr. Holmes' actions on July 20 were a direct result of his mental illness," Metzger said.
"It all boils down to whether you believe he had a delusion or not."
Robert Holmes, a retired statistician, is undergoing cross examination and his testimony resumes Wednesday. His wife, Arlene, is expected to follow him to the witness stand before the defense wraps up its case.
The jury could begin deliberations by Thursday. Jurors have the day off on Friday.
If they decide the mitigating factors outweigh the aggravating factors, the trial is over and Holmes will spend the rest of his life in prison. If not, the trial resumes into another sentencing phase in which the jury will hear from shooting survivors and relatives of the dead -- people Holmes referred to as "collateral damage" -- who will testify about how the crime has changed their lives.

North Korean rocket launch pad upgrade complete, analysts say

Satellite images suggest North Korea has finished the latest upgrade to its Sohae launching and rocket testing station in the country's west, analysts say.
Analysis published on the website 38 North says that workers appear to have finished building a moving support structure that's approximately 24 meters long, 30 meters wide and 33 meters high.
The structure would be used to erect the elements of the rocket, before transporting them to the launch tower for the final assembly and inspection.
Analysts say the upgrade allows the site to accommodate larger satellite launch vehicles than the UNHA-3 SLV, which has been used in the past.
The images also show what appears to be a shelter, which 38 North says could be used to conceal activity on a nearby railway line.
Work on the Sohae station has been underway since early 2013, after a launch which North Korea claims successfully put a satellite into orbit.
North Korean rocket scientists have told CNN that they have satellites ready to launch as soon as they receive instructions to do so.
Most observers think that order could be given in early October, when massive celebrations are underway in the country to mark the 70th anniversary of the Korean Worker's Party (KWP).
North Korea has said it will make all the necessary notifications in advance of any satellite launch.

Rapper Tyler the Creator slams feminist for Australia 'ban,' death threats ensue

An Australian feminist has received online death and rape threats from fans of U.S. rapper Tyler the Creator after he mistakenly claimed she had had him banned from the country.
Tyler, whose real name is Tyler Okonma, tweeted to his2.48 million Twitter followers on Monday that he had been denied a visa to play scheduled shows in Australia from September 3 to 8.
"You won @CoralieAlison I'm happy for you," he wrote, in a post that was retweeted more than 4,500 times.
The comment unleashed a torrent of abusive tweets, many of them threatening and misogynistic, towards Coralie Alison, director of operations for Collective Shout.
Collective Shout is an Australian feminist organization which has campaigned to have the rapper kept out of Australia.
"I'm coming to kill you," wrote one user in a tweet directed at Alison," as another tweeted that he had obtained her address.
"We will all rape you," wrote another.

Claim incorrect

Tyler's post was incorrect though, as his Australian tour promoter and Australia's Department of Immigration and Border Protection later clarified.
The performer's visa was still being assessed, a department spokesperson told CNN via email, adding that "in cases where a person is assessed as representing a risk that they may vilify or incite discord, or otherwise represent a danger to the Australian community, a person may be refused a visa."
Collective Shout began campaigning against the performer -- who is the leader of leftfield hip hop collective Odd Future -- in 2013, on the grounds that his lyrics incite hatred towards women.
"There is an epidemic of violence against women," Alison told CNN via email.
"We can't have a national plan to reduce violence against women at the same time as rolling out the red carpet for rap artists with his history."
While she said she had coped with the online abuse, she found it concerning.
"As activists we are used to receiving abuse. But abuse from Tyler's fans is particularly aggressive," she said.
"I have a thick skin so I don't let it get to me, however it does raise concerns when those that listen to Tyler's music go on to make rape and death threats. I draw a correlation."

'Misogynistic hate speech'

In a letter to Immigration Minister Peter Dutton on Collective Shout's website, the organization cites a lyric referencing strangling and chopping up a woman and raping her corpse as an example of the rapper's "misogynistic hate speech."
"The messages (propagated) in these lyrics pose particular risk to the Australian community by conveying the message that interpersonal conflict might be legitimately resolved through violence," the letter reads.
In June 2013, when Collective Shout activist Talitha Stone led the group's campaign for Tyler's visa to perform in Australia to be revoked, she was barraged with misogynistic threats from his fans.
When she attended Tyler's show at Sydney's Enmore Theater, the rapper, apparently unaware she was present, abused her from the stage, saying "f***ing b*tch, I wish she could hear me call her a b*tch, too, f***ing whore."

New Zealand ban

Tyler's group, Odd Future, was subsequently banned from performing in New Zealand at a 2014 festival as they were deemed by officials to be "a potential threat to public order and the public interest for several reasons, including incidents at past performances in which they have incited violence."
Odd Future had previously been dropped from a New Zealand festival bill following pressure from lobbyists.
Tyler, who had earlier tweeted the Melbourne was his "favorite place," responded to the controversy with a tweet stressing that he was not responsible for his fans' actions.
"I am so bummed that I can't go to a place that I fell in love with, it sucks, but yo, I am not responsible for what others say, no way, ever," he wrote.

Pakistani police: Militant leader killed in shootout

Pakistani police have killed the leader of an al Qaeda-linked militant group that has repeatedly carried out deadly attacks on the country's Shiite Muslim minority in recent years, authorities said Wednesday.
Malik Ishaq, the head of Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, was killed during a shootout after armed men on motorcycles ambushed a police convoy that was transporting him between prisons in Punjab province, Pakistan's Counter Terrorism Department said.
Lashkar-e-Jhangvi is known for targeting Shiites in Sunni-majority Pakistan, including a series of bombings in early 2013 that left more than 160 people dead in Balochistan province. Ishaq wasdetained by authorities soon after those attacks.
In the clash with police early Wednesday, the motorcycle-riding attackers freed Ishaq and two of his sons in the ambush, but police responded with gunfire that killed the terrorist leader, both of his sons and 12 others, authorities said.
The other militants fled the scene, according to the Counter Terrorism Department. Six police officials were injured, it said.
Police had taken Ishaq and his two sons to another prison to assist in identifying confiscated arms and explosives, authorities said. The ambush was reported to have taken place around 3 a.m., during the return journey.
Officials are investigating the attack.
Ishaq was believed to have been the mastermind behind the 2009 attack on the Sri Lankan cricket team in Lahore, the main city in Punjab.
More recently, Laskhar-e Jhangvi claimed responsibility for the January 2014 bombing of a bus carrying Shiite pilgrims that killed more than 20 people.
The group was outlawed in Pakistan in 2001 and designated a terrorist organization by the U.S. State Department in 2003.
The Counter Terrorism Department described Ishaq's death as "a big blow" to terrorist organizations in southern Punjab.

Iran deal: Why don't Americans like it?

I don't read polls for a living, and certainly don't want to compete with those who do. But I was intrigued by a new CNN poll that found a majority of Americans in favor of Congress rejecting the recently negotiated nuclear deal with Iran.
To be sure this is one poll; and others have reached very different conclusions. But regardless of whether you're for, against or somewhere in between, the Iran deal is a historic enterprise. Why then would Americans want to be skeptical or oppose it?
Here are some possibilities:

The agreement is too complicated

I doubt that many folks have read the 100 plus page text or the five detailed annexes, let alone followed the tick tock over the classified side agreements. The point is that the deal -- or what's in the four corners of the accord -- is complicated and can test even those who follow the issue closely. Interestingly, those polls that ask more detailed questions, such as did you know there was intrusive monitoring or snap back sanctions to punish Iranians, should they cheat, seem to get more positive reactions.
There's also the matter of how the Obama administration is selling the deal. If the most effective talking point is that there's no alternative to this agreement, that's hardly the most compelling way to sell it, particularly with a party that many Americans don't trust or believe will uphold their end of the bargain.

This isn't a peace treaty

And that gets to the question of the public's skepticism generally about Iran and whether or not Iran would uphold its end of the agreement. An earlier CNN poll, in June, found a full two-thirds of those polled skeptical that an agreement could be reached that would prevent Iran from getting a nuke. And post-agreement skepticism and mistrust remains high. Both Pew and Washington Post/ABC polls found majorities skeptical that Iran could be trusted to deliver on their commitments -- and that the agreement would actually work.
Such skepticism is hardly surprising, partly because it's based on negative attitudes toward Iran that have been building since the 1979 revolution and hostage crisis. A Gallup poll earlier this year found only 11% of Americans surveyed had a favorable opinion of Iran -- the lowest percentage of 22 countries, including Syrian, Russia and North Korea.
Indeed, if the Iran story were filled with heroic acts of peacemaking -- with pictures to highlight historic breakthroughs and handshakes, such as the Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty -- there might be a much more uniformly positive reaction. But President Obama is -- fairly or not -- a polarizing figure. And the Iranian mullahs are hardly poster children for pro-American sensibilities.

Don't like Obama, don't like the Iran deal

Here's a shocker for you: The partisan reaction to the agreement is sharp. The CNN poll found 66% of Republicans and 55% of independents saying Congress ought to reject it, compared with 61% of Democrats saying the opposite. The reality is the easiest way to determine where someone stands on the Iran deal is where they stand on the President. Indeed, the groups that tended to agree with the accord were almost identical to those that on balance liked the job Obama has been doing as president. "The New York Times" reported that "black, Democratic, liberal and younger voters were generally for the deal, while white, Republican, conservative and older voters were more likely to be opposed." It concluded that 82% of the variation in support for the Iran deal in 18 subgroups can be understood just by knowing what Obama's job approval rating was in each group.

Does public opinion matter?

With Congress about to go into recess and lawmakers returning to home districts, you might think that representatives and senators based on some of the polls will face a tsunami of negative reaction about the deal. And they well might. Even though public opinion on the deal appears fluid, the partisan gap on the issue seems destined to produce an intense Republican vs. Democrats battle. If the administration has the votes to sustain a presidential veto, the agreement will go through. And having not taken Congress' role all that seriously in the Iranian nuclear diplomacy, the administration isn't likely to be constrained by a few public opinion polls.
At the end of the day, perhaps the most painful reality is that on an issue so consequential to U.S. foreign policy, there is likely to be no real political consensus. But then again, give the current state of our politics, why should anyone be surprised by that?